One of the most important tools we can give our students is the ability to think critically. In this age of unlimited social media sharing, fake news, and hidden agendas, it has never been more important to be able to look at information and its source and determine if the information is accurate and true. Dictionary.com defines critical thinking as clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence. In a good history class, one that moves beyond the textbook, thinking critically is part of the package.
Students of history look at an event from many different perspectives. The use of both primary (first-hand accounts) and secondary (recounting with interpretation and analysis) sources helps students see an event from many different angles. Imagine an event like the Boston Massacre. The account of the British soldier involved would be very different from the patriot on the street. Likewise, Paul Revere, Thomas Jefferson, and King George III would all see the Boston Massacre from a different place. A twenty-first century historian would add another view of the event. A British historian and an American historian would likely see the event in two different lights. A student of history learns to read all the accounts and make judgments about the event. Were the patriots justified in their actions? Were the soldiers? Why did Paul Revere refer to the event as a massacre? How did the event contribute to the tensions between the colonies and the crown leading up to the American Revolution?
Students of history also must place the authors of their sources in context of their relationship to the event. Were they clearly on one side or another, or were they innocent bystanders? A tradesman from Boston (Revere) would have one take of the actions of the patriots and the soldiers, and a planter from Virginia (Jefferson) another. The British view of events leading up to the American Revolution contrasts starkly from the American version. Did you know the British refer to the event as “The Incident on King Street?” Everyone writes from their own bias, and recognizing the bias is key to interpreting the sources and drawing conclusions about the events. When looking at secondary works, students need to evaluate the sources that an author cites as well. Does the author cite both primary and secondary sources? Are they balanced in their approach? Is the author’s interpretation valid, or is there reason to question the conclusions?
Looking at different sources, the perspective of the author, and the bias brought to the event help students learn to discern and think critically. This important skill can be extrapolated to their non-academic life to determine if a news article, tweet, or report is valid or bait.
Becky Frank has been steeped in American History from her early days growing up on the family farm in Northeastern North Carolina. Although Barrow Creek Farm has been in her family since the 1680s, her parents were the first to live on it in three generations. On the farm she learned to milk cows, sheer sheep, and drive a tractor.
After an internship at Historic Edenton, she received a B.S. in Public History from Appalachian State University in 1992. Answering God’s call to teach in a classroom setting, she added teacher certification from East Carolina University to her degree in 1998. Becky then taught social studies in Gates County, North Carolina where her classes included U.S. History, World History, Economics, Government, and Humanities. In 2003 she married her husband John and left the classroom to start a family.
Becky has been teaching online for more than 10 years. She also homeschools her three children and is an active leader in the Children’s and Youth’s ministry at her church. She also enjoys gardening, cooking, scrapbooking and long walks with her kids and the family dog. Sharing the heritage of our great country is one of her passions as well. Her lifelong dream is to return to the family farm and make a portion of the acreage a living history site.
